Roy Lichtenstein mirror perception pictogram abstraction

Lichtenstein Mirror as print version (PDF with illus. 4.720 KB)


Roy Lichtenstein: Mirror (1972)

in: Sammlungskatalog Fondation Beyeler. Neuzugänge 1998-2003, Riehen/Basel/Wolfratshausen 2003, p. 36-37.
Lichtenstein’s paintings have a decidedly conceptual side that raises questions relating to the perception and depiction of objects. They attempt to reach the point at which intrinsically meaningless, stereotyped visual signs give rise to objective recognition. This is the reason for Lichtenstein’s interest in cartoons. In them he discovered a visual language in which the tension between abstracted visual symbols and drastic objectivity is at a maximum. He was also intrigued by the way in which comic-strip artists find powerful visual formulae even for phenomena that are hardly depictable, like explosions or rays of light. For Lichtenstein, comics were a prime example of the fact that successful representation need not depend on naturalistic means of depiction, but could result from habituation to certain visual conventions. His series of „Mirrors“ likely represents the theme of representation and perception in its most condensed form. This is due not least to the subject itself, the mirror, which since Plato has been viewed as a metaphor for the illusionistic nature of painting. A mirror shows reality exactly as it is. As an object, it recedes behind the changing images it reflects, itself remaining practically invisible. Lichtenstein’s Mirror, in contrast, seems to reflect nothing outside it. It manages the trick of showing not a reflected object but the process of reflection itself. This pictorial solution was not easy to find. It took some time, Lichtenstein said, to achieve something that would be a sufficiently interesting abstract image and at the same time could be read as a mirror. These two aspects – abstract painting and depiction of a mirror – stand in an extremely tense relationship to one another. We see a pattern of dots and different colored bands, which in no way resemble a mirror yet nevertheless convey an impression of one. The Ben Day dots, Lichtenstein’s trademark, make this especially clear. A technical device used in printing to reproduce halftones and mixed colors, they have the same effect here, where dark blue dots on a white ground evoke a shaded light blue. At the same time, the great enlargement of the dot pattern and its gradual diminution in size produce a flickering effect, which optically transform the flat surface into an evocation of an indeterminate, light-flooded space that appears reflected in the mirror. Fact and effect, patterned surface and illusion of depth, the materiality of the picture and the immateriality of its appearance, are played off against each other and thus become simultaneously perceptible. We are put in a position, as it were, of being able to observe our process of perception as it translates visual information into objective recognition. If „seeing“ normally means seeing „something as something,“ Lichtenstein draws out the „as“ to the point that it becomes visible as a process. Mirror resembles a mirror, but only in the sense that picture-puzzles resemble real things. It is virtually impossible to put our finger on the point in the image where the similarity on which recognition is based actually begins. The visual deception is further heightened by the artist’s choice of a format corresponding to that of an actual mirror. Mirror toys with being the thing itself. Yet this mirror does not reflect our likeness. All it reflects is a paradox of perception.

Lichtenstein Mirror as print version (PDF with illus. 4.720 KB)

10 Antworten auf „Roy Lichtenstein mirror perception pictogram abstraction“

  1. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point.
    You definitely know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence
    on just posting videos to your site when you could be giving us something enlightening to read?

  2. You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but
    I find this matter to be really something which I think I would never understand.
    It seems too complex and very broad for me. I am looking forward for your next post, I’ll
    try to get the hang of it!

  3. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find
    this matter to be really something that I think I would never understand.

    It seems too complicated and extremely broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I’ll try to get
    the hang of it!

  4. Thanks for every other fantastic article. Where else may
    anybody get that kind of information in such a perfect
    approach of writing? I’ve a presentation subsequent week, and I am on the search for such

  5. Do you mind if I quote a few of your posts as long as I provide
    credit and sources back to your blog? My blog is in the exact same niche as yours and my visitors
    would certainly benefit from some of the information you provide here.
    Please let me know if this okay with you. Thanks!

  6. Hmm it appears like your site ate my first comment (it was super
    long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I had written and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog.
    I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to everything.
    Do you have any tips and hints for inexperienced blog writers?
    I’d genuinely appreciate it.

  7. Excellent post. Keep writing such kind of information on your site.
    Im really impressed by it.
    Hey there, You have done an excellent job. I will definitely digg
    it and for my part recommend to my friends. I am sure they will be benefited from this website.

  8. It’s the best time to make some plans for the
    future and it’s time to be happy. I have read this
    post and if I could I want to suggest you few interesting things
    or tips. Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article.
    I desire to read more things about it!

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht.